Sunday, March 20, 2016
Saturday, March 12, 2016
Saturday, January 3, 2015
Monday, August 18, 2014
“Jesus Christ is God's language.”
– Leonard Sweet And Frank Viola in Jesus: A Theography
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” (John 14:6-7 NIV)
I am writing this from the deck of the Carnival Dream luxury liner. It is literally a floating luxury hotel. Along with 3000+ other passengers, we are speeding our way to Honduras on the first of 3 stops before returning to New Orleans.
This break has given me the opportunity to just stop. To simply stop. There are no sermons to write, reports to return, people to visit, or projects to work on. It's the gift of rest. With rest, comes reflection. Not the strained disciplined dissection of every action, motive, and thought, but the organic consideration of the meaning of things, the purposes of life, the mysteries of spirituality, and value of relationships.
The week prior to this trip, my world was rocked. One of my favorite people in life died in a tragic accident. He was a member of the congregation in which I serve on pastoral staff, a campus missionary to colleges in the area, a father, husband, and probably one of the most impactful people I have seen. Anyone who ever met Jake liked him. He lived soooo well. At his memorial service, which lasted over 4 hours but had over 1500 people from every spectrum of life there testifying to his impact and influence.
HIs life in essence was a life of love. Not the fluffy, emotive affection that we often regard as love (although, his wife shared that he did have some of that too). No, it was the fierce, sacrificial love that evokes a response. The kind of love that relentlessly pursues the object of its love.
Coincidentally (but not accidentally), I was reading Old Testament Scholar W. Brueggemann's book "An Unsettled God", devotionally. One of the many premises that he reveals in his excellent study of the attributes of God is that due to Israel's misunderstanding of the person of God, that God uses language in his redemption to reveal his character in a way that is unmistakable. The language he uses are "action words" that reveal the true character of God. (Redemption literally means to "buy back", and in the case of Brueggemann's study refers to the return of a conquored, scattered Israel back to his own land in the 6th century BCE). These words are ultimately revealed in Jesus and his body, also called the church. And I am going on record by saying that Jake Baxter exemplified what should be authentic in the church.
1. Gather: God spoke of "gathering Israel". The nature of God is to gather people together and unify them in community. Jesus came to "break down" the dividing wall between people, people groups and even that with God. Jake Baxter was a master community developer. Beginning with his home that housed friends, outsiders, the marginalized, and the opportunistic. All were welcome, all felt like they belonged. He showed hospitality as a lifestyle, not simply an event. Jesus revealed...
2. Love: God talked with Israel in romantic love. In the book of Hosea, God sees himself as husband to an unfaithful Israel that he will woo back through sacrificial acts of love. The Greek Scriptures tell us that God demonstrated his love for us in this: Christ (Jesus) died for sinners. Jake loved people in a way that cost him. He lived frugally and literally, everything he had materally, was open to be used for others in need. Some people stole from him, misunderstood his generosity, and took advantage of him, He understood that and was never angry or bitter because the purpose of the actions was not appreciation, but the demonstration of a God who is sacrificially geneorus to others, regardless of their ability to return the favor. Jesus revealed...
3. Heal: God promised to "heal Israel". There is a commitment to make Israel whole. This is different than making Israel wealthy or preventing affliction, but it's a commitment to make them complete. They would recognize that God has accepted them and that he deems them as both significant and secure. Jake ministered to many with addictions, character flaws (writer included), illnesses, and injuries (physical, mental, and emotional). He stood with so many on their journey toward wholeness. The paths of thousands were guided by Jake at sometime or another. Jesus revealed....
4. Forgive: God promised to "forgive all their sins". This shifts the understanding of God from primarily that of Judge to that of redeemer. This is ultimately revealed in Jesus who dies so that world may experience forgiveness. Jake not only practiced forgiveness but understood his relationship with God as that of a relationship of grace. It was because he was forgiven that he could forgive. Once again, Jesus revealed...
All this to say, upon reflection, I recognize that the reason that I was so impacted by Jake is because he is probably the closest reflection of Jesus that I have ever known. I know that Jake, like everyone else, was not perfect. But I am so thankful for having known him and thankful for his huge impact and influence in my life and outlook.
We worshipped Jesus at Jake's memoral services, and it was totally appropriate in light of his life.
Afterall, when Jesus is revealed, the only appropriate response is worship.
God bless you,
Pastor M Traylor
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
“People vote their identity, not issues.”
– Cecile Andrews in Living Room Revolution
"People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York — a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio’s wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?) This family represents the cultural changes that have enveloped parts — but not all — of America. To cultural conservatives, this doesn’t look like their country at all."
--Richard Cohen, Washington Post Columnist, 11/12/13
This morning, my twitter feed was buzzing about the comments that Washington Post Columnist said in defense of claims that the Republican Party is racist. His statements, on behalf of those whom he considers culturally conservative, was full of racist assumptions and perspective. I choose to believe that his comments, do not represent the beliefs of most Americans who identify themselves as culturally and politically conservative. I do not want to make the same mistake that has been made over and over again of making a polarizing figure a representative of an entire group of people.
However, I am intrigued by his use of words as a defense of being called racist. "Conventional" means to conform or adhere to acceptable standards or generally agreed upon codes of conduct. Mr. Cohen begins his statement by attempting to speak on behalf of a culture. After all, isnt culture simply often unspoken assumptions of roles, relationships, and responsibilities? He assumes that those who know the appropriate standards are sickened by the thought of a white man and a black woman having children who fascinatingly enough, end up being biracial. In order to push his point further, he has to mention that the mayor-elect wife has had same sex relationships in the past. Surely, that solidifies his point that conventional viewers should be outraged.
What Mr. Cohen misses is that his language is betraying his character, and may I be bold enough to say, his hatred. Dehumanization begins with objectifying others. He is not critical of the mayor-elect and his wife because of what they are doing (policy wise) but because of what he perceives they are. Thats where the ugly head of racism raises its head! When we begin to think of others as less because of the color of their skin or ethnicity, we begin to dehumanize them and that justifies every type of violence and degardation. He brings up his wife because she is black. He mentions her history because of the connotations he feels towards lesbians. It is easier to hate, easier to destroy, and most of all, easiest to feel justified in doing that.
Lets take some time to evaluate the words that are being said and speak against the language and rehetoric that masks hatred that is expressed in every type of -ism out there. Noting that our political activity has more to do with our understanding of who we are than the issues that are present.
Love to hear your thoughts,
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
"It's too easy for Christianity to have no consequence in our world."
~Emmanuel Katongole and Jonathan Hartgrove-Wilson in Mirror to the Church
When the foundations are being destroyed,cwhat can the righteous do?
I have been reflecting on the dynamic between God and evil. Specifically, the extension of God into this world: The Church and the manifestation of evil called suffering. The question that continually comes into my mind in multiple different varieties is "Does the Authentic Church have redemptive influence on the world and its evil?". Or sometimes I ask "just how much light is required to dispel darkness?"
I have struggled with these thoughts for many years as I thought about the Civil rights movement of the United States and although it had a wide variety of self-identified Christians as its adherents, it had many many more who opposed it. I think about it as I see the American faith community become co-oped by diverse political and economic forces as opposed to being a prophetic influence that seeks to usher in the reality of God's will of human flourishing that Jesus himself calls the Kingdom of God.
Nine months ago, I traveled to Rwanda. My few weeks there was one of my greatest seasons of learning. Many of you know of the horrific genocide that culminated in 1994 with over 1 million people being brutally killed and maimed in 100 days. Since that time, the people of Rwanda have sought grace, justice, and healing. As I visited and saw tremendous acts of love and forgiveness, I could not help to ask with Rwandan Author Emmanuel Katongole, "Why didn't Christianity make a difference". Why was Rwanda, which boasted as being 'the most Christian" of all African nations, unable to overcome the blood of hatred with the water of baptism?
The criticism is not just for Rwandan Churches, but for European Churches which used Christian teachings to divide and racialize the Rwandan society, as well as the American church which used its considerable resources and influence to prevent interventions in the massacre and promote isolation from the carnage.
One could argue, as those far away from Rwanda situation, that many of the Rwandan Christians were not really Christians at all, but just in name. I think this is a cop-out that keeps us from critically reflecting upon what is wrong with the church of Rwanda, and the church within the US.
I believe that the answer is found not in analyzing the sincerity of the Rwandan and Western Church's faith, but interrogating its assumptions regarding identity and purpose. I am suggesting several different models of Church that often have great intentions and positive effects, but are impotent against the systemic realities of evil and suffering.
1. The Pious Church: The Pious church sees itself as a group of Godly individuals who seek to help other individuals have a relationship with Jesus. The Pious Church seeks an evangelistic scorecard where the most important thing is how many people have developed a relationship with Jesus. The context of their lives, their pains and sufferings are not addressed as these things are promised in the afterlife. The Pious Church is interested in having people enter the Kingdom, but is intimidated to usher it in.
2. The Pastoral Church: The pastoral church is a person-centered community that seeks to give compassion and comfort to the suffering. It provides for the needs of those in misfortune and suffering, but rarely has the courage to ask why or how they got there in the first place. The Pastoral church feeds the hungry but never challenges the hunger. It grieves with the victim but never stands against violence. The Pastoral church is kind and compassionate but rarely courageous.
3. The Prosperity Church: The Prosperity church is a wealth-centered community that uses faith as a means to justify its own greed and lack of compassion (yup, I said it, go ahead read it again). The prosperity church proclaim "blessings" and announces the "divine favor of God" upon its constituents and uses its resources to support its own programs as well as lavish lifestyles for its leaders. The prosperity church rarely bothers to consider focusing on the most indigent communities except to exploit them for what few resources they have.
Each of these church models have sincere people of faith in them, but the consequences and ramifications of the faith expressed in these models is minimal when they are met with legitimate evil and suffering.
I believe that God is pointing out the ineptitude and impotence of these church models so that we have a hunger and a thirst to reclaim the patterns and ministry that Jesus initiated and invited his church to participate in:
The Proclaiming church: The Proclaiming church is focused on celebrating, demonstrating, and expressing the Kingdom of God as Jesus did. It is not as concerned with defending the good news that the Kingdom of God is near (Mark 1:14) as it is with demonstrating it. This demonstration or witness, is personal and public. It focusing on individual righteousness and justice as well as community righteousness (right-relationships) and justice. It is a sign as well as the reality of the presence of God whose love demands a response. It is identifying with the least in a way that is not simply charitable, but advocates for wholeness while standing in solidarity against systemic realities that often work to oppress, degrade, and persecute. It is, in the word's of Brenda Salter-McNeil, the credible witness of God.
In the days when violence and evil literally rip the foundations out of our lives, we must ask ourselves whether we have learned from our recent past. Will we dare to make a difference, or will we simply rehash the failures of the Pious, Pastoral, and Prosperity church?
I pray that you will be part of proclaiming movement of God that demonstrates the power and presence of the Kingdom of God in a very tangible way!
May God bless you,
Pastor M Traylor